Skip links
Case Study — Improving Oral Bioavailability

Case Study

Improving Oral Bioavailability of a
Poorly Soluble Molecule

A BCS Class II compound with promising efficacy was limited by low and variable exposure. We applied predictive modelling and formulation engineering to enable clinically viable performance.

Indication

CNS

Molecule Type

Small molecule

Challenge

Low solubility & exposure variability

Stage

Preclinical → First-in-human

Development pathway

01
Data aggregationPhysicochemical & PK profiling
02
Predictive modellingPBPK simulation of human exposure
03
Formulation strategyLipid-based delivery design
04
ValidationIn vitro / in vivo alignment
05
Clinical readinessFirst-in-human progression enabled

The Challenge

A molecule constrained by its
own delivery limitations

The molecule demonstrated strong pharmacological potential but was constrained by poor aqueous solubility and inconsistent oral exposure.

Preclinical studies revealed significant challenges that threatened the programme’s clinical viability.

  • High variability in gastrointestinal absorption
  • Suboptimal systemic exposure relative to efficacious targets
  • Lack of correlation between dose and pharmacokinetic response

Clinical implications

Uncertainty in dose selection for first-in-human study
Significant risk of under-exposure in clinical setting
Programme progression placed on hold
These limitations created meaningful uncertainty in clinical strategy and posed a direct risk to first-in-human progression.

Why Conventional Approaches Were Insufficient

Standard strategies
fell short

Standard formulation strategies — including micronisation and conventional solid dispersions — failed to deliver consistent improvements in bioavailability.

Micronisation improved dissolution rate but did not address variability in absorption
Conventional solid dispersions showed limited stability under stress conditions
Iterative trial-and-error consumed resources without a predictive rationale
Formulation decisions remained disconnected from clinical exposure targets

The underlying gap

No mechanistic framework linking formulation to in vivo performance
Absence of predictive modelling to guide strategy selection
Development cycles disconnected from clinical endpoint requirements

Our Approach

An integrated, prediction-led
development strategy

We implemented a structured approach combining mechanistic modelling with formulation design — anchored to clinical exposure targets from the outset.

01

Data Integration

Aggregation of physicochemical, preclinical PK, and permeability data. Identification of critical determinants of oral absorption.

02

Predictive Modelling

Development of a PBPK model to simulate human exposure. Scenario testing across candidate formulation strategies.

03

Formulation Strategy Design

Selection of a lipid-based delivery system. Optimisation for solubilisation capacity and absorption window alignment.

04

Iterative Validation

Alignment of in vitro and in vivo performance. Refinement guided by model-informed insights rather than empirical iteration.

Process at a glance

01
Data aggregationPhysicochemical & PK profiling
02
Predictive modellingPBPK human exposure simulation
03
Formulation strategyLipid-based delivery selection
04
ValidationIn vitro / in vivo alignment
05
Clinical readinessFirst-in-human progression enabled

Solution Implemented

A nano-enabled lipid-based
formulation platform

A lipid-based nano-enabled formulation was developed to enhance solubilisation and stabilise the drug in the gastrointestinal environment.

📈

Improved dissolution rate under physiologically relevant conditions

🔒

Reduced precipitation risk within the gastrointestinal tract

🎯

Enhanced permeability and absorption consistency across subjects

The engineering rationale

Lipid-based systems create a solubilised drug environment that persists through the gastrointestinal transit window. By engineering droplet architecture and excipient interactions, we stabilised drug concentration at the absorptive surface — translating directly into improved and reproducible systemic exposure.

Outcomes

Measurable improvements in
translational performance

📈
3–5×
Improvement in oral bioavailability (preclinical models)
🎯
↓ CV%
Reduced inter-subject variability in systemic exposure
⚙️
Linear
Improved dose proportionality across the tested range
FIH
Programme progressed to first-in-human study
The integrated approach significantly reduced development uncertainty and enabled a more confident, evidence-based clinical strategy.

What Made the Difference

Integration over
iteration

Four principles that distinguished this programme from conventional development approaches.

Early integration of predictive modelling with formulation design — before bench work began, not after.

Focus on clinical exposure targets from the outset — not just in vitro optimisation as an end in itself.

Iterative, data-driven decision-making framework that reduced reliance on empirical trial-and-error cycles.

Alignment across preclinical, formulation, and clinical objectives to ensure decisions were commercially viable.

Where This Approach Applies

Built for complex molecules
and high-risk assets

This methodology is directly applicable to a broad range of development challenges — wherever solubility, variability, or exposure limitations are constraining clinical progression.

Poorly soluble (BCS II/IV) molecules with suboptimal oral exposure
Compounds with high pharmacokinetic variability across subjects
Assets that have failed due to exposure limitations rather than pharmacological inadequacy
Preclinical candidates transitioning to first-in-human clinical development

Development Process

From data to
clinical readiness

01

Data aggregation

02

Predictive modelling

03

Formulation strategy

04

Validation & optimisation

05

Clinical readiness

🔒

Details have been generalised to preserve client confidentiality whilst accurately representing the scientific and strategic approach applied throughout this programme.

Work With Us

Have a molecule facing
similar challenges?

We work with complex, high-risk assets to design structured, de-risked pathways to clinical success.

Discuss a Collaboration
Explore
Drag